The Epstein Docs That Could Change Everything
PDS Published 04/28/2026
-
The DOJ said it released everything on I've seen, but by their own numbers, their million short. And so now this new lawsuit could change everything.
meanwhile, the German chancellor just said that America is being humiliated by Iran. And J.D. Vance reportedly doesn't believe the Pentagon's own war numbers.
why what we're about to see in Nebraska on Friday is expected to result in 5 to 10 million Americans losing their health care. but first step today, we've got to talk about this.
the more we learn about this would be assassin from the white House Correspondents Dinner, the weirder this story gets. right.
Starting with the fact that people have been digging through two accounts on X and blue Sky that appear to belong to the shooter, Cole Allen.
or with many of the details appearing to match up at that senior DOJ official confirming to CNN that at the very least, the X account is definitely his. for a while,
the accounts mostly just posted about video games and other innocuous things, but they started getting heavily political around the 2024 election.
with them, reposting a call to nullify the results post comparing Trump to Hitler and other post speculating that the Butler assassination attempt was staged.
ends up being kind of like peak ironies. And you're seeing so many people now thinking that this attempt was staged as well.
but then also in addition to that you're the accounts posting a lot about Ukraine expressing frustration that Trump betrayed an ally.
They also criticized what they called the dumb ass war in Iran and Trump's aggressive immigration policy. then things get a little more surprising.
because you've got screenshots going around that appear to show them reposting criticisms of the far left and pro-Palestinian protesters by people like Noah Smith and Brianna Wu.
well, the source of those screenshots appear to be a Sun Biker fan account.
It is basically consistent with the New York Times report noting that Allen's apparent profiles tended to repost more moderate Democrats like Will Stansell and even the anti-Trump Republican Bill Kristol.
with all of this ending up being notable because when news of the shooting broke out, you had Hassan being singled out as a proponent of supposedly violent rhetoric.
with the likes of Trump ally Laura Loomer and The Daily Wire's Michael Knowles pushing for him to be arrested,
as well as some liberals condemning his past statements, wrote which Hasan responded. This administration is a fascist administration.
They make no distinction between your statements that are anti-Trump as well and my statements. If I'm going to the camps, you're going to be there by my side.
I hope you understand that wherever.
Allen fully landed his apparent social media posts, they got more suggestive over time.
where they start talking about gun ownership, saying stuff like best time to buy a gun was days ago.
Second best time is today, In May of 2025, they accused the government of treason and added that that's not fixable with laws.
January, they appear to have written, I'm getting the impression that a lot of American politicians and staffers think this is all a game. and adding not really looking forward to that.
This is not a game portion of history that is 99% likely to be coming up.
then last month, they wrote more important question is when do the between 0 and 5 inclusive adults in America realize that this is not tenable?
And sitting around waiting for someone else to do something about it is not working.
can't think of the last time I saw anyone on slash offline take responsibility for fixing the problem but also now both X and blue Sky have taken down those accounts, with the latter explaining that it prohibits posts that amplify misinformation or glorify violence or harm.
those accounts are not the only thing people are trying to take down right now. right. Because connected all this. You have the Trump administration trying to once again take down Jimmy Kimmel. and that's because a couple of days before the shooting,
you had Kimmel doing his own Parody Correspondents Dinner on his show.
Or it's in strong to be at a mentalist host the actual dinner instead of a comedian like they usually do. You had Kimmel deciding to roast the administration with his own jokes. But the Trump family. They did not like this one clip in particular.
our first lady Melania is here. Look at more. So beautiful, Mrs. Trump. You have a glow like an expectant widow.
and so even though that was filmed and released before the shooting,
after the shooting, you had Melania Trump, who, of course, is the the wife of the famously peaceful speaker Donald Trump, posting Kimmel's hateful and violent rhetoric is intended to divide our country.
His monologue about my family isn't comedy. His words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America.
People like Kimmel shouldn't have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate. A coward.
Kimmel hides behind ABC because he knows the network will keep running cover to protect him. Enough is enough. It is time for ABC to take a stand.
How many times will ABC's leadership enable Kimmel's atrocious behavior at the expense of our community?
then Donald Trump himself joining in and saying, wow, Jimmy Kimmel, who is in no way funny as attested by his terrible television ratings, made a statement on his show that is really shocking.
appreciate that so many people are incensed by Kimmel's despicable call to violence and normally would not be responsive to anything that he said, but this is something far beyond the pale Jimmy Kimmel should be immediately fired by Disney and ABC.
the official white House account reposting that and then press secretary Caroline Leavitt jumping in as well.
Much of the manifesto of the would be assassin is indistinguishable from the words that we hear daily from so many.
For example, ABC's late night host Jimmy Kimmel disgustingly called first Lady Melania Trump, an expectant widow who, in their right mind says a wife would be glowing over the potential murder of her beloved husband.
Right. And then in response to all of this, you had Kimmel going on TV and saying this.
Obviously was a joke about their age difference and the look of joy we see on her face every time they're together.
It was a very light roast joke about the fact that he's almost 80 and she's younger than I am. It was not, by any stretch of the definition, a call to assassination.
And they know that I've been very vocal for many years speaking out against gun violence in particular, And also, I agree that hateful and violent rhetoric is something we should reject.
I do, and I think a great place to start to dial that back would be to have a conversation with your husband about it, because,
but now with all this, you have some of the reporting that Trump's Federal Communications Commission write the FCC, they're likely going to pursue an early review of Disney ABC's broadcast TV licenses.
though technically, it's unclear whether this is directly connected to Kimmel's joke or one of the two investigations already ongoing. because there's one. Looking into the company's diversity, equity and inclusion practices.
And another into Senate candidate James Talarico is appearance on the View for allegedly violating the equal opportunity rule.
but really, by the way, it wouldn't be the first time FCC Commissioner Brendan has threatened to pull a license. Nor would it be the first time that Kimmel has been censored. you know, with all that said,
there was at least one thing that Kimmel did agree with Trump on.
I don't believe for one second that the reason he decided to build this ballroom is for security. But this was a pretty good argument for building.
I might be pro ballroom now, weirdly, after this. That way, if anything terrible ever happens, at least they can dance.
actually speaking of the ballroom, Republicans are not giving this up. They are they're grabbing on onto it. And it is not a laughing matter to them. with, for example, Senator Lindsey Graham,
who chairs the budget committee announcing.
going to introduce legislation that would authorize $400 million to be spent to secure the to build the presidential ballroom.
I'm convinced if there had been a presidential ballroom adjacent to the white House, the guy would never gotten in.
So no, we're going to build this facility. And I would suggest to the next president, don't go to the Hilton. joining him,
you just had this group of other lawmakers from Lauren Boebert and Rand Paul to Eric Schmidt and Tim Sheehy, anyway, she,
he's saying it is an embarrassment to the strongest nation on earth that we cannot host gatherings in our nation's capital,
including ones attended by a president without the threat of violence and attempted assassinations.
then on the other side, you had people like AOC saying the real embarrassment here is the state of Trump's America.
I don't believe that in an era where they are jacking up prices from the American people when they are gutting everyone's health care,
when people cannot afford to pay their rent and their mortgages. That we should be choosing our precious treasure,
little treasure that we have in this country, to build an ornate castle on a scale of which is quite unprecedented and unbelievable without any sort of accountability to those funds.
-
Right then, you know, I have to say, well, this is understandably been dominating the headlines, something we've got to talk about that Trump has been trying very hard to keep out of those is Jeffrey Epstein.
especially because Acting Attorney General Todd Blanch,
which is sued over what the suit calls a brazen, shocking and ongoing violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. as far as specifically with this lawsuit being filed by Katie Phang,
who's a political commentator and a journalist who used to be a lawyer and used to host a show on MSNBC, ranging now runs an independent show on YouTube focused on politics and legal analysis
with a heavy emphasis on Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and what she calls the Epstein elite. her arguments direct. Right. The Epstein Files Transparency Act mandated a release of the files.
and she says that the DOJ failed to meet that standard, omitting documents and improperly redacting what was actually released.
And because she relies on those documents to do her job, the DOJ noncompliance has actively harmed her ability to report. I rely on compliance with the law for me to do my job.
I rely on compliance with the law for me to be able to process,
discern, research and do further investigation and to report to you about what I have learned,
discovered, read, seen, heard you name it.
But when there is active concealment going on by way of violation of a federal statute, I cannot do my job as a journalist. And so I'm suing.
and the lawsuit names Todd Blanch as the sole defendant, though it notes that many of the allegations actually stem from when he was deputy AG under Pam Bondi.
and the lawsuit calls out specific files that weren't released, including some that pertain to Trump, Right. Specifically, it notes that in one document, a woman accused Trump of assaulting her when she was a minor.
anyway, the FBI following through on this claim in four separate interviews,
the DOJ apparently produced 15 documents related to this alleged victim for Glenn Maxwell's attorneys. but only seven of those documents were produced under the Epstein Act.
and according to the lawsuit, contemporary reporting suggests that the withheld materials include 53 pages of interview documents and notes that remain unproduced.
so 53 pages of FBI interview material related to an alleged underage victim and an accusation against Trump handed over to Glenn Maxwell's defense,
but apparently not released to the public. I want to be very clear about what is being said and what is not being said here. the lawsuit is not claiming that the underlying allegation has been proven.
rather, what the lawsuit is claiming is that the federal government appears to be withholding documents.
The law required them to release, and that the documents being withheld happened to involve the sitting president. and so with that thing is asking the court for a few specific things.
First, she wants a declaration that failed to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. second, she wants the court to force him to remove unlawful redactions.
Thoroughly explain why any remaining redactions are necessary, and produce unreleased or retracted materials. and third. And this is also the move with the most teeth.
She wants the court to appoint a special master to oversee Blanche's compliance. special master, would not be in the DOJ.
This special master would not work for the victims and survivors.
This special master would work pretty much for the American people appointed by the court.
The special master would say, I'm going to call the balls and strikes as I see fit.
special master can also lay the groundwork for showing the noncompliance, which then results in contempt enforcement, you name it.
But at least it gets us to accountability people. So a special master is essentially a court appointed independent overseer. Someone outside of the DOJ, outside of that political chain of command,
with the authority to look at what's being released and decide what is actually compliant with the law.
it is a very important kind of mechanism that is very hard to ignore once it's in place. so then with all this, unsurprisingly, you had representative O'Connor,
who's been leading the congressional push on the Epstein files, praising the suit, calling it historic and adding, is one of the biggest cover ups in the history of our nation.
There must not be two tiers of justice. now as far as Blanche, for his part, has repeatedly defended the DOJ's handling of the files. Earlier this month on Fox News, for example, he said this.
We have released everything. So listen. We reviewed 6 million pieces of paper. What we released with anything associated with the Epstein files. So there we are,
not sitting on a single piece of paper and nothing that should be released. here's the obvious problem. Blanche himself said that the DOJ reviewed 6 million pages in reports,
have repeatedly noted that only 3.5 million pages were actually released. that is a 2.5 million page gaps.
Why they're Blanche misspoke or the DOJ is by his own numbers, sitting on a lot of paper.
and also a big thing here is that this lawsuit is not the only push for accountability that's happening right in fact, just this morning, you had The Washington Post reporting that the Government Accountability Office or the Gao o an independent congressional watchdog,
they're going to review the DOJ's handling of the files. And that review came after a group of senators,
led by Jeff Merkley, asked the office to look into what they called the resulting failure of the department to follow the law, respond to Congress and protect victims.
so you had Berkeley announcing today that the g o has officially opened the investigation, saying the Trump administration is cruelly denying equal justice under the law to all of Jeffrey Epstein's victims.
and adding this independent investigation is an important step in holding this administration accountable for siding with the rich and powerful to help cover up the abuse of our most vulnerable.
and then on top of that, just last week with the DOJ's own inspector general's office saying that it would audit the redactions process. so you now have three separate pressure points, a federal lawsuit,
a geo investigation and a DOJ inspector general audit. All aimed at the same thing. Really.
whether the law is actually being followed and whether the documents are actually being released.
but still there is this underlying question of will any of it stick the Epstein story. It's not dominating the news cycle like it was a few months ago. you've got Iran, Israel,
people getting fired, the attempted shooting, the Federal Reserve fire, the things just go on and on. Attention shifted. but all of these things are happening.
They are real, and they're moving in parallel.
so one of the questions in addition to does the public have the attention span here, is whether any of them have enough teeth to actually force some sort of release. Right. Lawsuits.
They can be slow Gao investigations, they can produce reports that could be filed and forgotten. Inspector general audits. They can recommend changes that never get implemented.
but the combination of all this, along with other people making sure that there is still a spotlight here.
It's the most concentrated accountability push on the Epstein files since the law was passed. we're going to have to see how this plays out.
But one thing is clear, and that is that the people that are pushing for accountability, they're not backing down.
-
and then there's more we've got to dive into in just a minute, but really quick, two things. little bit of self promo. I would absolutely love to see you in person.
And right now my Crashing Out tour is on sale. 12 dates, 12 cities. And you can get tickets right now at Crashing Out tour.com. going to be a great time, a great show. We can crash out together.
There's even tickets for meet and greets if you want that sort of thing. then also two we have a quick word from today's fantastic sponsor.
because you ever ignore something wrong with your body just because dealing with booking a doctor sounds worse.
yeah, it turns out that a lot of us, we're just out here hoping that things fix themselves instead of making that appointment. honestly, that is more about the system than it does about you. which is why I used to be sponsor doc.
And you should too,
Doc is a free app and website that helps you find and book high quality in-network doctors. You can find someone you love. you need a dentist, dermatologist, primary care doctor, or something more specific.
Zack doc has your back with over 150,000 providers across all 50 states, covering 200 plus specialties. search by specialty or symptoms, or filter by insurance location.
And whether you want to do an in-person visit or just do a video appointment, and read verified patient reviews.
So you're not just rolling the dice on who you're seeing, the best part is you can see real time availability and book instantly, with appointments usually happening within 24 to 72 hours, sometimes even same day.
just so easy.
And honestly, it takes less time than most of the stuff that you already do in a day stop putting off those doctor's appointments and scan that QR code, or go to Zuckerman bill to find an instantly book a top rated doctor today.
Zoc doc com slash fill. This message is sponsored by zap doc. but then diving right back into the news.
ZOCDOC
Just go to ZOCDOC and download the Zocdoc app for FREE. Then find and book a top-rated doctor today!
-
Iran is in a state of collapse. The UAE is leaving OPEC. And actually, that first thing that I said might be total bullshit. Because it's just something that. Yeah.
Trump posting on social media today, writing Iran has just informed us that they are in a state of collapse and adding they want us to open the Hormuz Strait as soon as possible as they try to figure out their leadership situation,
which I believe they will be able to do. Trump also has previously claimed that Iran has been defeated, that it's undergone regime change.
And that this new regime has agreed to most or even all of his demands, which apparently none of that is true.
and already you had a spokesperson for Iran's Defense Ministry seemingly contradicting Trump's latest claim.
instead saying the Trump administration must abandon its illegal and irrational demands and adding,
United States is no longer in a position to dictate its policy to independent nations.
at least as a recording, it's not clear whether the white House has responded to Iran's latest proposal, which would have both countries immediately lift their blockades in the Strait of Hormuz while postponing talks regarding Iran's nuclear program.
But it is expected that the administration will decline,
especially since Trump's repeatedly claimed that keeping Iran from ever having a nuclear weapon is one of, if not the primary objective of this war.
the also, according to the New York Times, Iran's proposal has apparently been subject to vigorous debate inside the administration.
with some believing it'll only take another couple of months of the US blockade to cause enough long term damage to Iran's energy industry that the regime will want to make a deal.
you then have others noting that Iran's positions have only hardened as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has solidified its hold on power.
actually with that, the US is reportedly assessed that neither the supreme leader nor the IRGC have actually given the negotiating team permission to make concessions on the nuclear program.
that's led some in the Trump administration to believe that only resuming military action can get the regime to change its tune.
and with us, you have Axios reporting that Trump himself is also torn between launching new military strikes or waiting to see whether his maximum pressure economic campaign ultimately pays
though, there is a chance that he's leaning toward the military option, with him reportedly telling one adviser recently that all Iran's leaders understand is bombs.
even with that, it's not clear that starting the war back up is going to work either.
and there, you have places like the Atlantic reporting that even Vice President J.D. Vance has repeatedly questioned the Pentagon's portrayal of the war in Iran.
that's reportedly including the accuracy of information that it's provided about the American military's remaining missile reserves and the Iranian military's remaining capabilities. Because Trump, he's echoed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth,
claiming that American stockpiles are virtually unlimited and that the Iranian military is wholly defeated those claims, they might not be supported by the actual facts. We're the center for Strategic and International Studies.
For example, they've estimated that the US may have gone through more than half of its pre-war supply of four key munitions.
with officials and outside advisers reportedly telling the Atlantic that the use of key weapons over the past couple of months,
it's produced a serious shortage that erodes America's ability to fight future wars.
that's as intelligence assessments reportedly say that Iran retains two thirds of its air force, the bulk of its missile launching capability and most of its small, fast boats that can lay mines and harass traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.
And then also in the meantime, well, we're gonna have to wait to see if we're going back to an active military confrontation. The U.S.
and Iran have actually clashed at the United Nations in New York the background there is that the UN has begun a review of the implementation of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Which it's done every five years since the treaty took effect in 1970.
under that deal, the five original nuclear powers the US, China, Russia, the UK and France, they agreed to negotiate toward eliminating their nuclear arsenals someday.
but you've also had U.N.
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres noting that despite the stated aim of the treaty, the number of nuclear warheads around the world is increasing for the first time in decades.
And countries like the US and Russia, they've even considered resuming live nuclear testing. then also notably Israel,
along with India, Pakistan and North Korea, they all possess or are believed to possess nuclear weapons despite not being part of the treaty. and in the meantime, nations without nuclear weapons, including Iran,
they're supposed to be able to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes in exchange for their promise to not develop weapons. and with that, Iran's argued that this gives them the right to enrich uranium.
But the treaty also doesn't explicitly say that, treaty does, however, require that Iran and other nations cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog.
But the regimes also refuse to give the agency's inspectors access to its main nuclear sites, since they were bombed by the US last June.
so, because of that, as well as Iran's broader history of compliance issues with the NPT, you've had the US taking issue with its election as one of 34 vice presidents of this conference,
with the US Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control and Nonproliferation, arguing that Iran has shown contempt for its commitments under the treaty and saying,
than choosing to use this review conference to defend the integrity of the NPT and call Iran to account, we instead elect Iran a vice president saying it is beyond shameful and an embarrassment to the credibility of this conference.
on the other side, you it Iran's ambassador to the UN in Vienna blasting the allegations from the US as baseless and politically motivated and opposing the election of the US as a vice president.
and they're noting that the US is the only country to have used nuclear weapons in war, and also accusing the US of expanding its nuclear arsenal in violation of the treaty and obstructing progress toward a nuclear weapons free Middle East by supporting Israel.
and notably besides Iran, the US is now increasingly facing criticism from its allies,
or with maybe the biggest example of that coming in the form of recent comments from German Chancellor Friedrich Maritz,
who said about the US this week, an entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership, especially by these so-called Revolutionary Guards. so I hope that this ends as quickly as possible.
Iranians are clearly stronger than expected.
And the Americans clearly have no truly convincing strategy in the negotiations, either. in the meantime, you're seeing fallout continuing to grow with, for example,
the United Arab Emirates announcing that it's no longer going to be a member of OPEC as of May 1st.
with OPEC being the organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its other members include major oil producing nations like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.
now, that said, you know, this decision, it has been rumored as a possibility for a while now, partly because a tense relations with Saudi Arabia, but also because of the UAE's desire
to produce and sell more oil without being limited by quotas, the impact over the long term, it could be significant, since it's one of the group's biggest producers and one of the few with the ability to quickly increase production.
you have experts saying that it's withdrawal will make it more difficult for the organization to calibrate, supply and stabilize prices. in the meantime, the street being locked down. It means this probably won't have an immediate effect on the market,
as continued uncertainty has kept the price of a barrel well over $100. You've got U.S. gas prices now hitting their highest level since the start of the war. and then connected to that, you have the climate group.
350 dawg publishing an analysis that it says shows the fallout from the war may cost the world more than $1 trillion. that's not even counting knock on effects of inflation,
higher fertilizer and food costs, lower economic activity and rising employment.
then, of course, on the flip side, oil companies were making money hand over fist.
you had BP reporting today that its profits for the first quarter of the year had more than doubled,
and you had the head of 350 saying in a statement Over the next few days, oil majors will report astronomical first quarter profits, much of it earned on the back of a war that has already killed thousands and impoverished millions.
adding even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens tomorrow, an obscene amount of money will continue to flow to oil coffers at the expense of ordinary people already struggling to afford fuel, electricity and food.
then also speaking about kind of shifting gears, but also still connected to all this. You now have Ukraine, Zelensky accusing Israel of purchasing grain. That was stolen from territory occupied by Russia.
saying the Israeli authorities cannot be unaware of which ships are arriving at the country's ports and what cargo they are carrying.
Ukraine actually summoned Israel's ambassador in Kiev and handed in what was described as a note of protest.
you also had Israel's foreign minister claiming that Ukraine hadn't provided any evidence for its claims, and adding Israel is a state that abides by the rule of law.
statement that also comes as Israeli troops are occupying parts of southern Lebanon and destroying homes that they describe as infrastructure belonging to Hezbollah.
even the Israeli military today ordering residents of another 16 towns and villages in southern Lebanon to evacuate immediately.
although with that you also had the foreign minister claiming Israel has no territorial ambitions in Lebanon and adding, our presence in the areas by our northern border serves one purpose protecting our citizens.
with that, while Hezbollah has kept up its drone and rocket attacks against Israeli troops in Lebanon and in northern Israel,
killing several people, Israeli air defenses have been largely effective and Lebanese citizens have been killed at a much higher rate.
with Israel reportedly killing dozens since the cease fire began and recently bringing the total death toll in Lebanon since March 2nd to 2521, with that including women, children,
journalists and medical workers.
it's also Israeli strikes have kept up in Gaza with some of the latest reportedly killing five, including a nine year old boy. so now, the total direct death toll there is almost reached 73,000,
according to Gaza's health ministry.
and it's as many are struggling to survive even to just get their most basic needs met.
with Doctors Without Borders accusing Israel of using water as a weapon by destroying and obstructing civilian water infrastructure as part of a campaign of what they said was collective punishment against Palestinians.
the situation there, it's largely been overshadowed by the broader conflict between the U.S. and Iran. and then there's even more that we've got to dive into in just a minute. But first, let me thank the sponsor and say,
-
You know, my brain, it has two modes locked in and getting things done or just completely off the rails wondering why I spent 20 minutes color coding a to do list that I'll never look at again.
so when I tell you that today's sponsor brained out of FM addresses that I mean it. right. It's not music.
It is audio that's engineered by neuroscientists to get your brain into the state that you need focus, relaxation or sleep. And it starts working in about five minutes, personalized to your brain.
Brain FM adjusts the neural effect level to what works for you, specifically, brains. They need a little nudge. And some of us, we need a full shove.
to use deep work, creativity, relaxation, sleep, even a power nap. And yes, an ADHD specific mode which I appreciate more than I'd like to admit. Are you? Random Spotify playlist.
It pulls your attention toward it. Brain FM it's specifically built so your brain stops noticing and just works.
and it's the only music app backed by a National Science Foundation grant to study focus actual science when he's saying this is worth researching.
so if your brain is basically a browser with 47 tabs open and no idea which one's playing music, this is for you. to brain, not fMRI for and go or scan that QR code on screen to get 30 days free.
That's brain that FMI DeFranco.
And you get a free month to find out what it actually feels like when your brain's working with you and not against you.
BRAIN.FM
Go to Brain.fm to get 30 days of free access to science-backed music that really works.
-
then diving right back into the news starting Friday, Nebraska becomes the test case for Medicaid work requirements in America.
if you're between 19 and 64 and you've got coverage for Medicaid expansion, you got to clock 80 hours a month, the work school, the community service, or you lose your health care.
so this is essentially the test of what Trump's big, beautiful bill is going to roll out nationwide in eight months.
a move that has researchers projecting that between 5 and 10 million people are going to lose their Medicaid because of it. in Nebraska specifically.
You had Governor Jim Pill in announcing back in December that his state would be the test case,
And his framing was that he wanted to make sure that every able bodied Nebraskan as part of their community.
we have over 100,000 job openings, jobs that can't be filled because we don't have enough people.
So there's incredible opportunities for every person who, is,
wanting Medicaid that is able body to work most importantly for our kids, it's really important for kids to see people in their household working, fulfilling the American dream.
really quick. I do want to flag something before we go further. Nebraska doesn't actually have a problem getting people to work. they actually have one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country. In February, it was 3.1%.
this is in a state where huge numbers of able bodied people are, you know, just sitting home, avoiding work. and so the able bodied framing, it's doing a lot of the heavy lifting in this kind of political rhetoric.
This is a hand up, not a handout. I think it's also important to, for all of us,
how rewarding work is. It's a key piece of giving the discipline for our families to be successful. It's a key piece of self-worth.
It's a key piece of mental health and stability. and so that I think it sounds nice to a lot of people, but also work requirements, they've been studied repeatedly.
And the data, it's consistent. do not actually increase employment. They just kick people off of Medicaid. as far as how the system works, here's the mechanics.
Nebraska first is to verify that the roughly 70,000 people already enrolled through expansion are still eligible.
with about 20 to 28,000 of them having to provide more documentation to keep their coverage, and then another 3 to 4000 of new enrollees each month, they're going to need to do the same.
well, right now, people only have to prove that they met the work requirement for at least one month out of the last year, by 2027, they'll have to maintain that for at least six months to keep their benefits.
though, there's also some flexibility, right?
People can show proof of making at least $580 a month instead of logging 80 hours so that'll help people who work for themselves, like freelancers or hairdressers.
but also here's one of the issues we have to wonder about whether that flexibility applies to specific situations, because the rules just aren't clear yet.
that's just one of the problems, states only got 18 months to roll this out. And you have health care officials warning it the speed alone. That's a problem.
real health policy experts saying the speed at which we are choosing to implement work requirements hasn't left a lot of space for really meaningful communication.
as you have real questions piling up, like do apprenticeships count as work if someone regularly goes to the hospital for care, how far does the travel have to be for a medical exemption?
And who checks you've got people confused. And once you're asked to provide more information, you only have 30 days to comply.
then if you can't navigate the bureaucracy fast enough, you just lose your coverage entirely. the administrative side doesn't look ready either.
Medicaid employees are about to review tens of thousands of accounts under a new mandate that they didn't have time to prepare for.
They do not appear to actually have the capacity to answer all of these questions in real time.
all of this is something that researchers have called administrative burden, the data there is brutally consistent. researchers say that the higher the administrative burden, the more likely people are found non-compliant and dis enrolled,
or to put it in plain English, when you stress the system, a lot of people, they don't fail the work requirement, they fail the paperwork. they miss a deadline. They can't get a question answered.
They don't realize they needed to upload a document, and they slipped through the cracks. lose their coverage. Not because they don't qualify, but because the system was designed in a way that they couldn't navigate.
and in fact, we are already starting to see the consequences.
seeing reports that are describing young parents who are going against advice from their own doctors to work, because they can't afford to lose their coverage.
And so you have people compromising their health to keep the very thing it's supposed to protect their health.
then there are also cases where Nebraska is using digital records to determine who keeps coverage,
which means that doctor's notes or other personal documents that might not be in the digital system can result in people losing their coverage for completely unjust reasons. So Nebraska,
they're supposed to get feedback from the federal government in June to help fix some of the issues,
then that just leaves a month where people's health care is hanging in the balance with no clear answers. again, this goes further than Nebraska.
Because whatever guidance Nebraska gets, it's going to be the template for other states. And what they adopt when this rolls out.
so if this isn't surprisingly figured out if the issues aren't ironed out this becomes a national problem affecting tens of millions of people. the with all this, you've been arguing that this is exactly what Trump wanted.
or even administration cutting social programs,
finding ways to cut the most vulnerable Americans or programs like Medicaid, while also spending massive amounts of money on the Iran war and on tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthiest households.
I understand with this specifically the people who lose, they're the ones with the least margin to absorb loss. right. Single parents managing chronic conditions. People in unstable jobs.
People who can't easily prove they qualify for an exemption. People without things like reliable internet access to upload digital records. and this will have real physical consequences.
Untreated diabetes miss cancer screenings. Mental health treatment just gets dropped. People not filling their subscriptions. There is a real downstream cost here, both human and financial.
so this is something they're going to be watching closely because Friday is a start. But again remember eight months from now it goes national. but then also, and this is one of the last things we got to talk about today.
-
Medicaid's not the only program that's on the chopping block.
Are you got the Trump administration now gearing up to cut support for hundreds of thousands of disabled Americans for the crime of living with their own families?
because you see the program in question here is Supplemental Security Income, SSI.
supports about 7.5 million Americans who can't earn a living because of severe disabilities or destitution and old age. These are people who in many cases literally cannot work.
size like what stands between them and just complete poverty. and according to ProPublica, multiple officials,
internal emails in a federal regulatory listing, the administration is preparing to cut benefits for some of the lowest income SSI recipients by up to a third.
some cases, it'll end their support entirely.
Propublica's analysis estimates that the number of people impacted is going to be close to 400,000.
as far as how exactly they're cutting, the proposed rule change deducts the value of a disabled adults bedroom from their SSI allotment.
to the treating the bedroom that you sleep in at your family's home as effectively a benefit that you receiving from your family and thus reducing your federal disability support to match.
then the paperwork to even maintain the reduce benefits. It's huge. according to ProPublica, disabled adults are extremely elderly. Recipients will have to file extensive monthly reports, including,
whether the property is leased or owned, the names of anyone who lives with them,
whether any of those people have new income or assets, documentation of all household bills and expenses, how much they do or don't personally contribute to those bills, bank statements and any pay stubs.
right.
And then in-person meetings will be required any time a caregiver's wages or hours change, any time bills get split differently, or any time someone tries to help cover an expense.
you know, your sister moves in temporarily if your dad picks up an extra shift.
If a relative pays a utility bill, this disabled person has to file paperwork or lose benefits. and again, all of that, just to keep their benefits at a reduced level.
you know, with all this, I think it's important to remember the real people it's impacting Because this isn't some hypothetical or abstract thing.
These are people, like a young couple struggling to support not just their kids, but also a parent with Alzheimer's.
have a woman whose 18 year old son with Down's syndrome lives at home while he tries to become a chef.
you know, people like, right here, a Burton who is diagnosed with a whole list of developmental and intellectual disabilities that left her with an IQ below 70,
despite her graduating high school and even taking classes at a community college, she wasn't able to get hired anywhere.
so she lives with her dad and uses their monthly $994 SSI check to help pay the bills.
but if and when this new policy takes effect, her SSI check could be cut by $330 a month.
these cuts, they're going to be felt even more so by families who are already on programs like Snap.
like as long standing federal policy that if a family already qualified for assistance like Snap,
then they were officially deemed financially unable to support a disabled loved the thinking here is pretty straightforward.
If your family is poor enough to need food assistance themselves, they can't be supporting you. So your SSI check stays the full amount so you can support yourself. that rule, it changed under Trump. and so now.
It doesn't matter if the family's already on Snap, already on Medicaid, are already on the edge of poverty themselves.
Anyone living at home after they turn 18 without paying full rent will be treated as if they have a benefactor.
again the value of their bedroom plus any income and assets that their family has gets calculated and recalculated and deducted from their SSI check.
and so that poor family that takes in a disabled adult child, they get penalized.
A family that's already getting food assistance because they can't afford groceries themselves, now sees their disabled family member's income reduced because the federal government's decided that the family must be a benefactor.
it ends up punishing the families that are doing the most for their disabled relatives, the one who can't afford private care, the ones who keep their loved ones out of institutions,
the ones that are picking up the slack for a system that already underserved disabled Americans. what's crazy is that this isn't surprising.
This isn't even the first time that the Trump administration has gone after disability programs. Right.
Rather than fixing the actual inefficiencies in SSI, those in the white House pushed out about 7000 Social Security employees.
and that includes people who are specifically working on SSI reforms and clearing backlogs.
then they undid the Biden administration's improvements to the program's efficiency.
this latest cut, it follows the lead of conservative think tank that have argued that paying low income SSI recipients less, it could save the federal government $20 billion over the next decade.
is it just to do some math for you here at 20 billion and projected savings over ten years, paid for by cutting checks to 400,000 of the most disabled people in America that is being proposed.
That will happen. Meanwhile, the Iran war cost over $11 billion in just the first six days alone. Trump's big beautiful bill.
It's delivering $50,000 plus a year in tax savings for the top 1% in the country. moves in the math just don't fucking make sense. but with all that said, right,
as far as where things stand now, your ProPublica reporting of the rule change is being reviewed by the white House Office of Management and Budget. Right. So there is still editing happening.
We're gonna have to see what happens there. then after that,
it goes back to the Social Security Administration for publication, which would then trigger a public comment period.
And depending on how much opposition that rule faces, it could be maybe next year before this is actually implemented. as far as the OMB,
you at its communications director calling Propublica's reporting, quote, false because it speculates about policies that have not yet been decided, with them then going a step further and calling this story, quote, trash.
but again, like with all things Trump and his administration, words or words, actions or actions.
And so this is something we're gonna have to keep our eyes on and see how it plays out.
especially because with this one, there is a time when people who oppose it can put their objections on the federal record. But that my friends, you beautiful bastards, is the end of your Tuesday Philip DeFranco show.
as I close out today's show, and, you know, you're hitting that,
like, button, and maybe you're subscribing for the daily videos, if you're new here and you're jumping into those comments to let me know what you think in. let me just say thank you for watching. I love yo faces.
And I'll see you right back here tomorrow for another dive into the crazy world of daily news. These days.
