The Graham Platner Situation Has Divided The Internet & How Joe Rogan is Changing Cancer Research
PDS Published 10/22/2025
-
Getting a tattoo while you’re drunk is a bad idea… and getting one that at best looks like a Nazi symbol and at worst literally is one is a MUCH worse idea.
Which is the exact situation the Democratic Candidate in Maine’s Senate race, Graham Platner, has found himself in.
Images of the tattoo are a bit blurry, but it doesn’t take an expert at Nazi iconography to recognize that it looks A LOT like the Tote-en-kopf, or Death’s Head. [Pronunciation @0:02ish]
(Before Nazi apologists try to “um akshully” you: Technically the Death’s Head has existed in German military traditions for much longer than the Nazis, but ever since World War II and its use among SS Divisions it's been exclusively associated with them).
Platner claims that he got the tattoo in 2007 while in the Marine Corps and on leave in Croatia and that one night he got drunk and decided to get a “skull and crossbones” tattoo without ever realizing the one he got seems to be VERY similar to the Nazi symbol.
He claims that he only recently learned about the resemblance and made plans to get it removed.
And that’s despite multiple government agencies taking a look at it.
For example, he joined the Army and they check all tattoos for any possible hate symbols and apparently didn’t have an issue with the tat.[]
Platner added that “I also passed a full background check to receive a security clearance to join the Ambassador to Afghanistan’s security detail.”
However he was understandably impatient and got it covered up yesterday, telling reporters “Going to a tattoo removal place is going to take awhile. I wanted this thing off my body.”
(And of course, as I was about to submit this we got what the cover looks like and it’s some kind of Celtic/Norse inspired wolf).
What’s wild is that this is just the latest gaffe for the progressive candidate in the race.
It looks like opposition research did their work, because not only was the tattoo found but also past Facebook posts where Platner said some pretty bad things.
This includes charged comments like asking about Black people’s tipping habits, mocking rural Americans, and dismissing military sexual assaults.
(He still kinda stands by his questioning about Black people. He asked about it on Pod Save America he said:
“I was legitimately asking the question. I mean, that was the point of the thread to ask the question. Amusingly enough, I remember this time when I first started bar tending and I had a conversation with a friend of mine who black, who was a bartender, who did a great job walking me through structural injustice, a feeling of a lack of agency, and after that I was like ‘Oh yeah, that makes absolute perfect sense.’ It certainly was not a malicious thing,” @0:32-1:08
He then later added “that one, I must say, I was legitimately curious.”
Platner has tried to downplay the comments by saying they were made during a dark time in his life after leaving the Army and still suffering the effects of PTSD.
However, he does address them head on as “proof” of how much he’s grown, and telling the AP: [read]
“I don’t look at this as a liability. I look at this as a life that I have lived, a journey that has been difficult, that has been full of struggle, that has also gotten me to where I am today. And I’m very proud of who I am.”
Even with all this and the constant calls for him to back out, Platner still plans to run and has the endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders as of recording.
For many on the right, the fact that Platner still has any support among progressives is crazy and has led to memes. [2] [3]
Even some on the left, like Hasan Piker, felt that progressive would defend their own regardless of the optics, and wrote:
“seeing a lot of libs defend platner over the establishment pick janet mills because he has a leftist platform & it seems like they’re tired of the status quo electability arguments of the dems. Now imagine if you had a candidate who didn't have a blackwater cv & a totemkopf.” []
All that said, this is clearly going to be an uphill battle for Platner.
Right, it’s still the primary season and he’s up against two-term Governor Janet Mills.
Winning against Mills would just be the first miracle, because after that he’ll have to go against Sen. Susan Collins, who is a fairly popular Republican in the state and has held the seat for like 30 years.
(Just an observation but you could run with it:
We’re starting to get a bigger wave of candidates who grew up/ had almost their entire adult lives on the internet and we’re seeing the repercussions of past statements starting to haunt people.
So are we going to get an entire generation that is borderline unelectable, or are voters just going to get used to the idea that everyone is flawed and has said something stupid at least once?)
Go to HelloFresh now to Get 10 Free Meals + a Free Item for Life!
-
This wave of anti-science legislation is crashing across the country and its victims are the most vulnerable.
Right, RFK Jr.’s “Make American Healthy Again” movement has sparked a lot of conversation on the federal level.
With his baseless attack on Tylenol, implementing anti-vaxxers in key roles on vaccines, and on and on and on.
You can only do so much damage before people start taking issue.
But maybe the more substantial impact has been on the state level - with an AP investigation finding more than 400 pieces of anti-science legislation introduced in statehouses across the country this year alone.
Based on conspiracy theories like fluoride in drinking water being used to poison the population, pasteurization making milk less nutritious and only benefiting the dairy industry, and vaccines killing or hurting people.
Of those 400 plus, anti-vax bills were most common - with about 350 pieces of legislation introduced coming at vaccines from different angles.
Like barring discrimination against unvaccinated people, creating the criminal offense of vaccine harm, requiring blood banks to test for evidence of vaccinations, and instituting a 48-hour vaccine waiting period - just to name a few.
Now, most of these bills haven’t taken hold - only 26 of those have been adopted in 11 different states.
But that doesn’t mean there aren’t people at risk in places where herd immunity is compromised.
With the AP pointing to 8 year old Liam Dahlberg of Lowell, Indiana - who died from a vaccine-preventable disease earlier this year.
According to his parents, Liam was vaccinated against Hib - or Haemophilus influenzae (hee-moff-a-luss in-floo-en-zay) type b - but the other kids in his community weren’t.
Because the Hib vaccine isn’t required for kids entering public schools in Indiana.
With doctors saying Liam, who was particularly vulnerable because of his severe asthma, likely picked up Hib from an unvaccinated kid.
It caused his brain to swell and it killed him less than 2 days after he complained of a headache.
With Liam’s father, Eric, saying,
“I thought having the vaccines would protect our children. Unfortunately, it did not because other kids, other adults, need to be vaccinated as well in order for it to work.”
And now, these parents have to grieve the loss of their son while also ensuring that their other children - one of whom also has severe asthma - remain safe in a county with low immunization rates.
With Liam’s mother, Ashlee, saying,
“There’s no pain that is worse than the pain of losing a child. I do not – and can’t – live through the loss of another.”
Of course, it isn’t just vaccines - the AP also found 70 pieces of legislation proposed to ban fluoride in public drinking water as well as expanding access to raw milk.
Again, only a few of those have taken hold but there’s still serious harm being done.
In the case of raw milk, a California mother bought some for her toddler after seeing a wellness influencer share a video of RFK Jr. taking shots of it.
After looking around online, she found a homesteader selling “clean and tested” raw goat’s milk.
Her daughter Brooklyn was hospitalized and nearly died after drinking it - suffering 3 cardiac arrests and winding up on dialysis and a ventilator before turning a corner.
Even now, this little girl has high blood pressure and walks with a limp - with Brooklyn’s mother saying that making raw milk more available is dangerous,
“You’re going to have the average mom like me that thinks they’ve done their research, think they’re doing something to help their baby and end up hurting their baby.”
Now, the organizations and people pushing these causes can often be traced back to RFK Jr. himself - with most of those bills being supported by at least one of four national groups connected to him.
Those 4 being Make America Healthy Again Action, Stand for Health Freedom, the National Vaccine Information Center, and the Weston A. Price Foundation.
With many of their arguments relying on the premise of “staying healthy naturally” and rejecting the idea that these proposed laws are based on conspiracy theories.
Despite the extensive scientific evidence contradicting their causes.
Right, vaccines have saved the lives of more than 150 million people since 1974, fluoride in drinking water has caused a dramatic decrease in cavities since 1945.
Not to mention the millions of foodborne illnesses prevented by the pasteurization process.
Now, that blatant disregard and even condemnation of decades of established research is exactly why these are being called “anti-science laws.”
And the growing spread of “anti-science laws” has prompted serious concern in experts - with Devin Burghart, president and executive director of the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights, saying,
“The march of conspiracy thinking from the margins to the mainstream now guiding public policy should be a wake-up call for all Americans. People are literally going to die from it as a result.”
But this is more than legislation - we’re also seeing states starting to funnel taxpayer money into conspiracy theories like this.
In Florida, it was just announced that part of their research money will go towards funding the study of ivermectin as a cancer treatment option.
Despite the fact that oncologists and medical experts say there isn’t evidence that ivermectin is effective to treat cancer in humans yet.
Now, if ivermectin sounds familiar it’s because it was a big talking point during the pandemic - with the driving voice behind it at the time being Joe Rogan.
And the continued discussion about it, this time in reference to cancer, can also be credited to Rogan.
With Governor DeSantis’ wife saying,
“Mel Gibson was on Joe Rogan’s podcast and he was talking about people that he was friends with and they overcame Stage 4 cancer. We should look at it, we should look at the benefits of it. We shouldn’t just speculate and guess.” []
And that episode she’s referring to did go viral - getting nearly 12 million views on YouTube and countless more in clips across the internet.
With Gibson being a big name among fringe medical groups and social media influencers touting ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
And while there have been some studies showing that ivermectin could maybe have anticancer effects, experts are saying it’s very far off the grand cure claims being made.
So you’ve got oncologists questioning whether or not this is a reasonable use of Florida taxpayers’ money in the light of other public health priorities.
With Otis Brawley, professor of oncology at Johns Hopkins University, saying,
“The shame is there are probably three dozen compounds that I can name right now that have scientific reason why we think they might be useful in the treatment of cancer, and we do not have the money to do the research to assess those drugs.”
Right, because ivermectin is big in the current conversation, it’s getting more focus despite probably not being the best option.
With that, I’m going to pass the question off to you - what are your thoughts here?
About the ivermectin in Florida or the legislation across the country.
Let me know in those comments down below.
-
Donald Trump wants to pay himself $230 million with taxpayer money.
And specifically, according to the New York Times, he’s demanding that the Justice Department pay him that amount as compensation for criminally investigating him in the past.
And the people who get to decide whether or not he gets the money? They’re some of his closest allies and only now have their jobs because of him.
But with that, this all goes back to before Trump became president again, when he reportedly submitted two complaints known as “administrative claims.”
Right, these aren’t technically lawsuits, but if the Justice Department rejects one, the person who filed the claim will often then decide to bring a lawsuit.
Although, in this case, of course, it seems unlikely to come to that.
Right, Trump reportedly submitted the first claim in late 2023 seeking damages for a number of purported violations of his rights – including the FBI and special counsel investigation into Russian election meddling and alleged connections to his 2016 campaign. []
He then submitted the second complaint in the summer of 2024 – accusing the FBI of violating his privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago for classifieddocuments two years earlier.
With him also accusing the DOJ of engaging in “malicious prosecution” by charging him with mishandling those records after he left office. []
But of course, now, the DOJ? It’s Trump’s DOJ.
And according to the department manual, settlements of claims for more than $4 million “must be approved by the deputy attorney general or associate attorney general.” []
The current deputy attorney general is Todd Blanche – who not only served as Trump’s lead criminal defense lawyer, but also said at his confirmation hearing that his attorney-client relationship with Trump wasn’t ending.
And then, the person who would be considered the current associate attorney general?
That’s the chief of the department’s civil division – Stanley Woodward Jr.
He represented Trump’s co-defendant in the classified documents case – and he has also represented a number of other Trump allies – including current FBI Director Kash Patel.
But despite all that, a Justice Department spokesperson reportedly wouldn’t say whether Blanche or Woodward would recuse themselves from overseeing this case – saying instead:
“In any circumstance, all officials at the Department of Justice follow the guidance of career ethics officials.”
Notably, however, Attorney General Pam Bondi? She fired the department’s top ethics adviser back in July.
And so now you have people like one ethics professor at Pace University saying:
“What a travesty. The ethical conflict is just so basic and fundamental, you don’t need a law professor to explain it.” – adding:
“And then to have people in the Justice Department decide whether his claim should be successful or not, and these are the people who serve him deciding whether he wins or loses. It’s bizarre and almost too outlandish to believe.”
And notably, with all this, you have had Trump – if not giving specifics – at least acknowledging his claims for compensation when asked about the Times’ reporting:
“I don't know what the numbers are. I don't even talk to them about it. All I know is that they would owe me a lot of money, but I'm not looking for money. I'd give it to charity or something. I would give it to charity. Any money. But look what they did. They rigged the election. And as you know, we had in one case 60 Minutes had to pay us a lot of money. George ‘Slavadopoulos’ had to pay us a lot of money. And they already paid — you know, they paid me a lot of money because what they did was wrong.” (38:27-38:53)
But also, more than that, he seemingly acknowledged the inherent conflict of interest – even admitting that it would ultimately be his decision:
“Now, with the country it's interesting because I'm the one that makes the decision, right? And you know that decision would have to go across my desk, and it's awfully strange to make a decision where I'm paying myself — in other words, did you ever have one of those cases where you have to decide how much you're paying yourself in damages? But I was damaged very greatly, and any money that I would get I would give to charity.” (38:57-39:19)
Now, with all that, it’s unclear how serious Trump really is about getting this money.
But notably, if or when he does? We might not even know about it because the Justice Department doesn’t specifically require a public announcement when settlements are made for administrative claims. []
So we’ll have to wait to see what happens and whether we hear about it but in the meantime, you know I’d love to hear your thoughts and reactions to this situation in those comments down below.
-
Paul Ingrassia (In-grah-see-uh) has withdrawn his nomination to lead the Office of Special Counsel after he told other Republicans over text that he had “a Nazi streak.”
Right, as I talked about yesterday, that was just ONE of the controversial and racist text messages he sent other Republicans in a group chat that was leaked to Politico by one of the people in the chat.
Though, notably here, you had his lawyer both trying to frame his comments as a joke while also suggesting that they might be fake.
But it seemed like a lot of people weren’t buying that — including multiple key Republican Senators, who announced that they would vote against Ingrassia’s confirmation.
With some even suggesting that the White House should pull his nomination in the wake of the leak.
But that is obviously unnecessary now, because you had Ingrassia himself announcing on X that he was withdrawing ahead of a now-canceled Senate hearing on his nomination that had been set for tomorrow, with writing:
“unfortunately I do not have enough Republican votes at this time.”
And adding, “I appreciate the overwhelming support that I have received throughout this process and will continue to serve President Trump and this administration to Make America Great Again!”[]
And that last part is actually important here, because you have many people wondering how exactly Ingrassia will “continue to serve” now that his nomination has been pulled.
Right, while going through the confirmation process to lead the Office of Special Counsel, Ingrassia has been working as a White House liaison with the Department of Homeland Security.
But we’ve been seeing numerous reports that, at least as of recording, Ingrassia STILL has his liaison job.
And the White House has refused to respond to questions from multiple outlets about whether he will be staying in the role.
Because, you know, his “Nazi streak” might be too much for the Senate, but it’s possible he just doesn’t quiiiite reach the Trump administration’s high bar for what qualifies as too Nazi…
Get an exclusive NordVPN deal at NordVPN Risk free with Nord's 30-day money back guarantee!
-
Arizona’s Attorney General is suing House Speaker Mike Johnson for refusing to swear in a Democrat who was elected nearly a full month ago.
Right, as we’ve talked about many times before, Johnson has still not sworn in Adelita Grijalva (Add-uh-lee-tuh Gree-hall-vuh), who won a special election to fill a vacant seat back in September.
With Johnson claiming that he can’t swear her in because the House isn’t in session.
This despite the fact that there isn’t any rule that says that, and Johnson himself swore in two Republicans while the House was out of session earlier this year.
But Gree-hall-vuh believes that Johnson is intentionally dragging his feet because she would be the final signature on a petition that would force a vote on releasing the Epstein files.
With that petition allowing a bipartisan majority of members to circumvent Johnson and his Republican leadership team, who have repeatedly tried to prevent a full floor vote on the matter.
And after threatening to take legal action, Arizona AG Kris Mayes has now officially filed a lawsuit against the House Speaker.
Arguing that Johnson doesn’t have the power to prevent Gree-hall-vuh from taking office, and asking a judge to allow someone else to swear her in if Johnson won’t, writing:
“By withholding the oath and the office that comes with it, the Speaker has unlawfully interfered with Ms.Gree-hall-vuh’s constitutional right to take office, and the State’s right to the number of Representatives provided for by law.”[]
With her going on to accuse Johnson of “actively stripping the people of Arizona of one of their seats in Congress and disenfranchising the voters of Arizona’s seventh Congressional district in the process.”[]
Now, Johnson, for his part, has denounced the lawsuit, calling it “patently absurd” and claiming that Mayes has “no jurisdiction.”
And, during a press conference earlier this week, he repeated his claim that Mayes’ legal threats are just a publicity stunt, with him also seemingly trying to blame Gree-hall-vuh for the fact that her constituents are not receiving help and representation:
“Instead of doing TikTok videos, she should be serving her constituents. She could be taking their calls. She could be directing them, trying to help them through the crisis that the Democrats have created by shutting down the government.” 00:07 - 00:16
But that’s a pretty dumb fucking comeback…
Like that’s the point Gree-hall-vuh has been trying to make this ENTIRE time — that she can’t do her job as a sworn member of Congress because he WON’T LET HER be a sworn member of Congress.
With Gree-hall-vuh hitting back at Johnson, saying that she doesn’t have a budget right now because she hasn’t been sworn in, so she can’t open an office in her district to serve her constituents, adding:
“But, respectfully, there is so much that cannot be done until I am sworn in. So every moment that passes that I’m not able to provide constituent services or be a voice for Arizona, I cannot bring the issues forward that they sent me here to do. While we're getting a lot of attention for not being sworn in, I'd rather get the attention for doing my job.” 1:15 - 1:37
Right, and to that point, AG Mayes has also said that Johnson’s actions here are causing real, direct harm to the people of Gree-hall-vuh’s district.
Telling CNN that the Congresswoman-elect has not been able to help flood victims or people who need assistance with Social Security and veterans' benefits.
So for now, we’ll have to wait and see how this lawsuit plays out, but it’s also unclear what Johnson’s real endgame is here.
Right, Gree-hall-vuh will eventually be sworn in, and when she does, the Epstein files will go to the floor for a vote.
Hell, you even had Johnson himself seemingly admitting this inevitably, telling reporters yesterday that he won’t block the vote.
Which is actually quite notable because there was speculation that he would try to pull out all the stops to prevent the measure from going to the floor.
-
The Louvre is finally open after thieves managed to nab over $100 million worth of jewels from the museum on Sunday.
Right, it was a historic heist, and it has raised major questions about how this could happen at one of the most famous art museums in the world.
If you need a quick TLDR on how it went down, well, these thieves were fast, efficient, and pulled this stunt off in broad daylight.
At around 9:30 am on Sunday, just after the museum opened, a group of four parked a truck under the window of the Apollo Gallery, and then used an electric ladder attached to the vehicle to ascend to a balcony, where they used power tools to break into the glass windows.
And they also reportedly used those tools to threaten guards and smash cases once inside. []
By 9:34, they were in the gallery, and by 9:38 they were exiting through the windows again to escape with their haul on scooters.
So in total, this heist was less than eight minutes, and only around four minutes were spent inside the museum walls.
And remember, this all went down while the museum was open, so some people heard or even witnessed some of what was going down before being told to evacuate. []
And this has just captivated international attention.
French President Emmanual Macron calling the theft an attack on French heritage, adding that:[]
“We will recover the works, and the perpetrators will be brought to justice. Everything is being done, everywhere, to achieve this, under the leadership of the Paris prosecutor's office.”
But the biggest talking point is about security.
Right, because these people walked away with some good shit, their haul included a bunch of France’s crown jewels.
Things like a tiara with over 200 pearls and 2,000 diamonds, a sapphire tiara and necklace set, parts of Napoleon’s emerald wedding gift set, and other pieces with tons of precious diamonds.
Things that you would think would be heavily protected, especially since they were just a hop, skip, and jump away from the museum’s most prized possession: the Mona Lisa.
But obviously, there were major gaps in security, and a leaked report from a French auditor actually found that there is a wing of the Louvre where 75% of the area is not covered by security cameras. []
And in the wing where the heist happened, which, again, is also home to the Mona Lisa, one third of the rooms do not have surveillance cameras.
Notably, the room that was targeted in the heist does have cameras.
But many think this highlights a pretty obvious security flaw at a major museum.
This as the New York Times was also reporting on staffing shortages that had allegedly gone unaddressed for years, especially among security guards.
And that unions had been trying to warn that the constant renovations, repairs, events, and more taking place at the museum made it difficult to monitor and spot suspicious activity.
Though, some have argued that fully securing the Louvre is no easy task, right, it is a very massive and very old building, with the French Culture Minister saying that:
“When the Louvre Museum was designed, it wasn’t designed to welcome 10 million visitors or prepared for these new forms of criminality.”
But you have others still thinking it is a major embarrassment that this theft was successfully carried out, with the country’s justice minister saying that:
“We failed. People were able to park a furniture hoist in the middle of Paris, get people up it in several minutes to grab priceless jewels,”
Further saying this paints a “deplorable image of France.”
The museum’s director was also grilled by the French senate today, and according France24, she said the museum’s alarms worked well, but did acknowledge that security camera coverage is insufficient, including at the site of the crime, saying:[]
"The only camera installed is directed westward and therefore did not cover the balcony involved in the break-in.”
"There are some perimeter cameras, but they are aging.”
She also called the incident a failure and took responsibility for it.[]
As far as the investigation is concerned, the manhunt for the thieves is still underway.
There are 60 investigators on the case, with some reports saying there is DNA that can be looked at and analyzed as well. [][l]
Which actually brings us to something almost as valuable as what was taken, which is what the robbers left behind.
Right, in their escape, they actually dropped a crown outside of the museum, which has since been recovered, though it was damaged in the heist. []
Police also said they found angle grinders, a blow torch, gasoline, gloves, a walkie talkie, blanket, and yellow fest at and around the scene.
And it seems that the thieves intended on setting their truck and some of the other items on fire, but were chased away by security before they could actually do so.
Then, as for what the thieves plan on doing with their haul, well, there is an obvious guess.
Right, they went after jewels, not art, for a good reason.
Because with a painting, it can’t easily be resold without being recognized, and it can’t be cut down for parts, it needs to be intact for it to be worth anything.
Jewels, on the other hand, that is a different story, with an art crime professor telling NBC News:[]
“They stole items that can be easily taken apart, melted down, recut, and sold on the legitimate market with it being very difficult to trace them.”
Now, of course, there is a chance that the robbers do have an interest in the historical and artistic value of the pieces because they are really priceless pieces in their historic context.
But most experts think they are just selling those jewels, because even though cutting them down lessens their value, it’s still a ton of money.
But we will have to see how this all plays out, if these people are caught, if anything is recovered.
Today was the first day the museum was open since the theft, though the gallery that was targeted still had its doors closed.
So we will just have to keep our eyes on this one.
-
But then finally today, as we wind things down, I want to end with congratulations.
And one more thing
starting with a big congrats to John, the winner of these weekly giveaway.
Right? John's looking to catch the playoff games for the rest of y'all.
That's right, he is still giving away $500 and tickets every week.
And you should definitely enter today if you haven't already.
I mean, you could be the next winner and snag $500 towards
seeing your favorite artist, sporting event or play.
I mean, there's like over
70,000 events to choose from and all you got to do is just add code
DeFranco to your SeatGeek app profile for a chance.
The weekly $500 prize. No purchase necessary.
That said, the final bit today is a piece from today's brand new podcast
I just released, Crashing Out Episode four now.
Wow. That's crazy.
Well, this week's episode is coming in at just under an hour and a half.
Links to watch or listen on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts.
In the description, I thought I entered a show with this bite from the pod.
Speaking of being freed from a prison, Jorge Santos is out.
Phil.
Or if this episode, if you're getting to this episode, maybe Diddy.
Maybe I know, I think honest, I've been writing about this online.
I think he's building, a Legion of Doom.
He's building a rogues gallery.
Trump makes everything make more, man, he's at
and at the head of the table is gonna be the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein.
He's like, yeah, that's the that's the leader.
Well, in DC comics, his name is Gentleman Ghost.
They they it's he's just they're floating.
I don't think he's building a ballroom.
I think he's building that weird Darth Vader head from the from Superfriends.
And it's he's refilling. He's not draining the swamp.
He's refilling the swamp.
And there's a big Darth Vader head.
And this is where they're going to edit in all these imagery,
for the YouTube video.
And it's going to be Donald Trump in a, in a Legion.
He's gonna be in the Lex Luther
green and purple, and he's going to be yelling at the Joker.
And, it's gonna be just that's just gonna be JD Vance.
Your editors are going to have such a hell of a time putting this there.
Like, we're literally doing none of this.
If we have. No, we have two double shows.
Do that, do it, do it editors and don't use I do it all by hand.
Get it? Please don't use. I don't want to make it.
Make a George Sand.
Not make George Santos as cheetah from Wonder Woman.
Because that's how I want.
I mean, now that he's.
Now that he's back out, we might be able to pay enough to get a cameo of him.
Just doing that.
You probably could.
But that, my friends, is the end of this video.
But it's not the end of all the goodness today.
I don't even know if I would qualify today's show as the goodness, though.
If you do want some goodness,
I got that brand new episode of Crashing Out that just dropped today.
The PDS is 90% news, 10% of opinion.
That's the inverse of that. It's it's a it's a great ride today.
And then of course, you've got the newest Phil DeFranco show
that you might not have seen yet with links to those on YouTube,
Spotify and Apple Podcasts also in the description down below.
But no matter what you do, let me just say thank you for watching.
I love yo faces and I'll see you right back here tomorrow.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(973x757:975x759)/Louvre-Paris-robbers-101925-01-caefbd2385724fc3878a05b52e0e4350.jpg){kind=link}
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(792x419:794x421):format(webp)/sapphire-tiara-necklace-earring-102025-1-da473220acda414c98aa163a45b9416f.jpg){kind=link}
