The Delta Plane Crash Is Crazy, Is Trump Helping Andrew Tate Now, and US & Russia Look To Partner 👀
PDS Published 02/18/2025
-
We’ve gotta talk about Delta Airlines Flight 4819. (broll)
[Clip, 00:05 - 00:11] Caption: “We just landed. Our plane crashed. It’s upside down.”
So that video was taken Monday afternoon by John Nelson, a passenger on a flight from Minneapolis to Toronto. [Continue B roll]
With it operated by Endeavor Air, a subsidiary of Delta. [Same B roll]
And as it came in for a landing, the weather was reportedly rough.
Right, you’ve got 20 to 30 mile-per-hour winds, with reported gusts up to 40 miles. [Quote, find “40”]
And apparently the runway was covered in snow, with the temperature dropping to 18 degrees Fahrenheit, or just negative two degrees with the windchill. [Quote same link, find “degrees”]
Then, Nelson explained to ABC what it was like when the plane touched down.
[Clip, 00:42 - 00:45, 00:47 - 00:50] Caption: “We hit the runway really hard. … And we kind of popped up and it felt like we were leaning to the left.”
And next, we see the moment of disaster on a bystander’s camera as the plane flipped completely upside-down and burst into flames. [Lead B roll into clip]
And to give you a sense of how hard this thing must have crashed, apparently the tail and one of the wings got completely torn off. [Image]
So immediately air traffic controllers, paramedics and firefighters lept into action.
[Clip, 01:49 - 02:56] Caption: [Voice 1:] “Just so you’re aware, there’s people also walking around outside the aircraft there.” [Voice 2:] “Yeah, we’ve got it. The aircraft’s upside down and burning.”
Right, because not only might people be hurt, but there’s a fire, which means there could be an explosion.
Meanwhile, the passengers are strapped into their seats, hanging upside down and utterly shell shocked.
So at the behest of flight attendants who were described as remaining professional through the ordeal, dozens of people literally crawled out of the wreckage onto the tarmac.
[Clip, 00:00 - 00:09]
So in the end, all 80 passengers and crew got out with no reported fatalities. [Continue B roll]
Though at least 18 people reportedly suffered injuries, 15 of which were minor and three critical but not life-threatening. [Quote, find “18”]
[Clip, 00:25 - 00:29] Caption: “Yo, I was just on this f****** plane.”
Now before you ask, no, this was not a Boeing plane.
Right, it was a CRJ-900 manufactured by the Canadian company Bombardier, a plane that reportedly has a solid safety record. [Quote, find “solid”]
Though to be clear, right now we have no idea if this had anything to do with the plane itself, adverse weather conditions or some other factor.
So now Canadian authorities are investigating the crash with help from officials at the FAA.
But while everyone miraculously survived this incident, it only adds to the list of dramatic crashes recently, more of which were deadly.
Such as the mid-air collision between a plane and a helicopter in D.C. last month that killed 67 people. [Image]
Or the crash in South Korea that killed 179 people the month before that. [B roll]
So yeah, I guess, uh, what are your travel plans this summer y’all?
Links:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/multiple-people-are-injured-delta-jet-incident-toronto-pearson-airport-rcna192508
-
PART 1: FAA
The man famous for saying “you’re fired” is now truly living up to his name.
Right, over the past few days, Donald Trump has been firing thousands of employees across the federal government.
With the mass terminations potentially violating law in some cases.
And beyond that, possibly having massive implications for everything from aviation safety to public health to the handling of the country’s nuclear weapons.
And with that, since it’s been a big topic lately, let’s start with that first one: aviation.
Right, besides the Toronto crash landing yesterday, it’s been just three weeks since that fatal midair collision between an army helicopter and a passenger jet over Washington DC.
With that crash reigniting concerns about the safety of air travel in the US in general but especially in connection to the country’s nationwide shortage of air traffic controllers.
Which is why you have a lot of people bringing it up in response to the Trump administration not hiring new staff but instead firing hundreds of FAA employees.
With the president of a union representing 11,000 FAA and DOD employees saying in a statement that probationary workers began receiving emails late Friday notifying them of their termination.
With him claiming the employees were fired “without cause nor based on performance or conduct” –
And also noting that the emails were from an “exec order” Microsoft email address — not a government email address.
And with that, as far as how many employees have been let go?
Well, after prompting from former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg, current secretary Sean Duffy responded last night saying fewer than 400 FAA employees had been fired.
With him also claiming that “Zero air traffic controllers and critical safety personnel were let go.” []
But with that, not everyone seems to be in agreement regarding who exactly qualifies as “critical safety personnel.”
The Guardian, for example, reporting that those terminated include maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, environmental protection specialists, aviation safety assistants, and management administration personnel.[]
With a former FAA air traffic controller claiming that agency personnel who were terminated “maintain every piece of equipment that keeps flying safe, from the radars to the [instrument landing system], to ATC automation”.[]
And with that, the Associated Press reportedly reached out to the Department of Transportation about the firing of personnel hired for FAA radar, landing and navigational aid maintenance.
With a D.O.T. official initially responding by claiming the agency retained employees who perform critical safety functions…
But then backtracking by saying they would actually have to look into whether these workers were considered to handle critical safety functions. []
And on top of that, other fired employees reportedly include those who were working on an early warning radar system for Hawaii to detect incoming cruise missiles.
Right, it’s a program partly funded by the Department of Defense, and it’s just one of the FAA’s National Airspace System Defense Programs.
And so you have one of the fired employees telling the AP their work is “about protecting national security” and adding:
“I’m scared to death.”
“And the American public should be scared too.”[]
With him also saying:
“I don’t think they even knew what NDP does, they just thought, oh no big deal, he just works for the FAA.”[]
And with all that, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association said in a statement yesterday that it was “analyzing the effect of the reported federal employee terminations on aviation safety, the national airspace system and our members.”[]
So we’ll have to wait and see what they find and ultimately if and what kind of impact this all has on safety.
But in the meantime, I will say that the current conversation around aviation safety goes way beyond these firings.
Right, going back to that exchange between Sean Duffey and Pete Buttigieg?
You also had Duffey accusing his predecessor of failing to address the air traffic controller shortage and update the country’s air traffic control system, claiming:
“In less than four weeks, we have already begun the process and are engaging the smartest minds in the entire world.”[]
And with that, one, it’s generally true that the Biden administration was unable to remedy the shortage or modernize the country’s outdated air traffic control system.
But notably, of course, neither did the previous Trump administration.
Right, these are issues that go back at least a decade, if not more.
But secondly, it’s not exactly clear how the current Trump administration plans to deal with it either, but what we know so far has raised questions.
And that’s because whatever the plan is it seems like the world’s richest man will have a lot of say in the matter.
Right, earlier this month, Duffey said Elon Musk’s DOGE team would “plug in to help upgrade our aviation system.”
And now, this weekend, you had him saying employees from Elon Musks’ company SpaceX employees would be visiting the Air Traffic Control System Command Center in Virginia to, quote:
“...get a firsthand look at the current system, learn what air traffic controllers like and dislike about their current tools, and envision how we can make a new, better, modern and safer system.”[]
But notably, it’s not clear what kind of expertise SpaceX, which is a company specializing in rocket launches, has in how the air traffic control system works.
And in fact, Musk? He has repeatedly clashed with the FAA in the past over its regulation of SpaceX, calling on its previous leader to resign and threatening to sue the agency after it proposed fining the company.
PART 2: DHHS, Nuclear, is this legal?
And of course, many believe Musk has had a hand in the mass firings not only at the FAA but across the entire federal government.
For example, another one of the hardest hit agencies?
The Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health to name a few.
And with that, the thousands of employees that have been let go reportedly include not only scientists and researchers –
But also administrators overseeing grant proposals, analysts figuring out new ways to cut health care costs, and computer specialists trying to update government systems for tracking health information.[]
And with that, a top FDA official actually resigned this week, citing the “indiscriminate firing” of 89 staff members from the agency’s food program.
And of course, in general, the loss of so many employees from the nation’s health agencies has people worried about what it could mean for everything from fighting disease to keeping food safe.
And there’s similar worries about potential unseen consequences at other agencies as well.
The Department of Energy, for example, has fired about 2,000 employees, including workers the Trump administration apparently didn’t realize were responsible for managing the country’s nuclear weapons.
Right, specifically, the Trump administration let go up to 350 employees of the National Nuclear Security Administration late Thursday.
With some reportedly losing access to email before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning to find they were locked out.[]
With then the the head of a group by the name of the Arms Control Association commenting:
“The DOGE people are coming in with absolutely no knowledge of what these departments are responsible for.”
“They don’t seem to realize that it’s actually the department of nuclear weapons more than it is the Department of Energy.”[]
But of course, eventually, they did realize it.
And by late Friday night, the agency’s acting director issued a memo rescinding the firings for all but 28 of those hundreds of fired staff members.[]
The only problem?
Some of those fired employees could not all be reached after they were fired.
Plus, some are reportedly reconsidering whether to return to work, given the uncertainty created by DOGE.[]
And so now we’re in this situation where the administration is reportedly scrambling to convince those they can get in touch with that they should come back.
And in fact, they’re reportedly not the only employees who were fired by mistake.
Which isn’t really all that surprising when you consider the scale of this.
Right, we’ve only been able to talk about a few of the affected agencies but this is everywhere:
400 at the Department of Homeland Security, 1,000 at the Department of Veterans Affairs, more than 3,000 people at the U.S. Forest Service.
And soon, potentially thousands of IRS employees smack dab in the middle of tax season.
And overall, the Trump administration hasn’t said how many workers have been fired.
But notably, the government employed more than 200,000 probationary workers as of last year.[]
And these probationary workers? They’re the ones being fired right now.
They’re generally people who have been on the job less than a year.
Though, besides that, the purges have also swept up people with years of service who had recently transferred between agencies –
As well as military veterans and people with disabilities employed through a program that sped their hiring but put them on two years’ probation.[]
And with that, as usual, we get to the question we get to with most Trump stories: Is this even legal?
And as usual, the answer is, maybe, possibly even probably, not.
Right, because while it’s true that probationary employees are generally easier to fire and have fewer protections, it’s not like they don’t have any rights at all.
And so to cover their bases, the termination letters people are getting all reportedly make the same claim: you’re getting fired because of poor job performance.
But notably, according to reporting by the Washington Post, many of those fired had just received positive reviews, or had not worked in the government long enough to receive even a single rating.[]
Some employees also reportedly said everything seemed rushed and there were many errors.
For example, termination letters at Education listed the wrong job, or the wrong start date.
A legal help number offered in a notice sent to a Small Business Administration employee led to the voicemail for an apartment building, not a lawyer.
And some firing letters seemed copy-pasted from a form and left out the name of the agency where employees worked.[]
And with all that, according to an attorney at a law firm specializing in litigation by federal employees, firing employees en masse with the same claim of poor performance is illegal.
With him adding:
“It can’t be true,”
“They’re clearly not articulating this on an individual basis, which is what makes it so suspect.”[]
A spokesperson for the Office of Personnel management, however, repeated something the office has said before:
“The probationary period is a continuation of the job application process, not an entitlement for permanent employment.”[]
And so ultimately we’ll have to wait and see how this plays out in court.
But the worry of course in the meantime is that a lot of the damage is already done.
And with that, I gotta pass the question off to you.
What are your thoughts here?
And again, if you’re one of those who are personally impacted by this in some way, I’d especially love to hear from you.
-
Apparently Andrew Tate has an ally in the White House.
Because The Financial Times just reported that the Trump administration is pressuring the Romanian government to lift its travel restrictions on the Tate brothers. [Headline]
Right, in case you’re lucky enough not to know about these fellas, they’re heroes of the so-called man-o-sphere who allegedly lured young women and girls into their camming and porn business. [Image]
With the brothers now facing charges in both the U.K. and Romania for human trafficking, sexual misconduct, money laundering, operating an organized crime group, and rape.
And while the investigation in Romania, where they live, unfolds, they’ve been banned from leaving the country.
But apparently they saw a way out of their bind, 5,000 miles away in Washington D.C.
Specifically in Elon Musk, who said “he’s not wrong” in response to a post claiming that Andrew’s bid to become prime minister of the U.K. will “transform British politics & create an army of men demanding change.” [Tweet]
Right, because a couple of weeks ago, Tristan Tate seized on the alleged scandals the DOGE team had supposedly exposed and wrote:
“I wonder if any USAID went to Romania to fund any particular lawfare base investigations.” [Tweet]
And in response to that, a user claimed to have uncovered a State Department document outlining goals to improve the rule of law and strengthen judicial institutions in Romania. [Tweet]
So then in response to that, Trump’s special envoy, Richard Grenell [Pronounce 00:09], wrote:
“The USAid programs were weaponized against people and politicians who weren’t woke. The Biden team spent US taxpayer money to support left wing programs and candidates around the world. Conservatives around the world were targeted. Romania is the latest example.” [Tweet]
So last week, the Tates’ case was reportedly brought up by US officials in a phone call with the Romanian government. [Quote, find “phone call”]
And then, sources told the Times that Grenell revisited the issue with the Romanian foreign minister at a Security conference in Munich. [Quote same link, find “Munich”]
With the foreign minister reportedly confirming to local media that the Tates’ name had been brought up. [Quote, find “confirmed”]
But Grenell downplayed the news, telling the Times:
He “saw me in the hallway” and “asked for a meeting,” claiming that they had “no substantive conversation.” [Quote]
Though in case it wasn’t clear, he also added, “I support the Tate brothers as evident by my publicly available tweets.” [Quote same link]
So now the Tate brothers appear to be milking their support from the White House, with Andrew writing on X Monday:
“It was Biden who locked us up in the first place. USAid-sponsored attack.” [Tweet]
And then posting: “The USAID money that was being used to destroy our influence online with baseless criminal trials has dried up.” [Tweet]
So yeah, we’ll have to see if having friends in Washington helps the Tates get out of the legal trouble they’re in, or if Romania resists the pressure.
Links:
https://gizmodo.com/trump-administration-wants-to-help-get-professional-misogynist-andrew-tate-out-of-romania-2000564796
Go to ZipRecruiter and try it for free.
-
Elon Musk is not actually the leader of DOGE — he’s not even an employee of DOGE at all.
And that’s the official party line—the White House literally said that itself in a new court filing.
Right, when Trump first announced DOGE, he explicitly said that Musk would be leading the effort.
And since Trump took office, it really seemed like that was the case — I mean, you always see Musk talking about DOGE in a way that really makes it seem like he’s leading it.
And Trump does the same too — just last week, the president featured Musk at a conference where he answered questions about the whole operation.
But in federal court filings in a case against Musk and the DOGE effort, a White House official explicitly said that the Tesla CEO is NOT an employee of DOGE in any capacity.
Instead claiming that Musk is an employee of the White House Office, which is entirely separate from DOGE.
With the official specifically saying that Musk is actually a “non career special government employee” who serves as a senior adviser to the president, and adding:
“Like other senior White House advisors, Mr. Musk has no actual or formal authority to make government decisions.”
Right, so an absolutely MASSIVE shift from how basically the entire American public has been viewing Musk’s role here…
But as far as who ACTUALLY runs DOGE if it isn’t Musk, that also remains unclear.
The filing doesn’t say who is in charge.
And the executive order Trump signed establishing that DOGE would replace the U.S. Digital Service — that also didn’t clarify who the administrator is.
What’s more, the White House has also now been responding to reporter’s requests for comment about who is actually leading DOGE.
Hell, even some lawyers for the administration don’t seem to be able to answer that question.
Right, after a hearing this Friday about DOGE’s access to sensitive Treasury Department payment systems and records, reporters asked the Treasury’s senior counsel who leads DOGE, and he responded:
“I don't know the answer to that.”
But don’t let the general Trump administration chaos undermine the significance of what’s going on here —
The American public and even top administration officials have no idea who is running this whole operation that has been given sweeping powers and granted access to a ton of sensitive information.
Right, and on the note of accessing information, we also have several important updates I want to hit on.
The first is that groups that advocate for unionized workers, taxpayers, and small businesses filed a lawsuit against the federal government yesterday to stop an attempt by DOGE to access sensitive data maintained by the IRS.
With this coming after sources told reporters this weekend that DOGE was seeking broad access to tax-agency systems, property, and datasets.
This including the Integrated Data Retrieval System — or IDRS — which is used for IRS employees to access IRS accounts that include sensitive information, like personal identification numbers and bank information.
And allowing DOGE to access that information would be major because, as The Washington Post explains:
“IDRS access is extremely limited — taxpayers who have had their information wrongfully disclosed or even inspected are entitled by law to monetary damages.”
And adding that sources say that “the request for DOGE access has raised deep concern within the IRS.”
Right, and so in their new lawsuit, the taxpayer and union groups claim that, unless the court intervenes, DOGE would be able to see information about taxpayers’ net worth, income, bank accounts, charitable donations, and Social Security numbers.
With them arguing that data at issue here is highly protected — political appointees don’t usually get to access it, including even IRS commissioners.
But, of course, that isn’t the only sensitive information that DOGE is attempting to access.
We also got the news yesterday that a federal district judge has refused to block DOGE from obtaining sensitive student data from the Department of Education.
Right, earlier this month, the University of California Student Association filed a lawsuit alleging that the department has been illegally sharing confidential student data with DOGE in violation of federal privacy law.
With The Post reporting that DOGE has gained access to multiple databases that house personal information about students, including dates of birth, contact information, and Social Security numbers.
But in his ruling, Judge Randolph Moss argued that potential harms to students were “entirely conjectural.”
Saying that the lawsuit “provides no evidence, beyond sheer speculation” that the Education Department or DOGE would “misuse or further disseminate this information.”
But, during a hearing on Friday, Moss also openly expressed concerns about the scope of DOGE’s access to data and the secrecy its employees are operating under.
Which he described as “a unique lack of transparency.”
And, very notably here, when Moss pressed Trump administration lawyers about the identities and specific activities of the members of DOGE, the attorneys were unable to answer.
Repeatedly responding that those very important details were uncertain — further indicating that even top officials don’t know who is running these efforts or exactly what it is that they are doing.
But Moss’s ruling here just continues the uneven legal enforcement we’ve seen in DOGE’s battle to access sensitive data.
A battle that has also resulted in the resignation of multiple senior officials.
Which brings us to the final piece of news I want to hit on here —
Which is that it’s now being reported that the top official at the Social Security Administration has officially stepped down after a clash with DOGE over its efforts to access sensitive personal data about millions of Americans.
According to multiple sources, Michelle King — who worked at the agency for decades before becoming the acting commissioner last month — decided to step down abruptly after refusing to let DOGE access private information.
And a spokesperson for the White House seemingly confirmed that King had left, saying that while the Senate continues the confirmation for a full-time commissioner, the SSA:
“will be led by a career Social Security anti-fraud expert as the acting commissioner.”
With sources telling The Post that, to fill the acting role, Trump has appointed a manager in charge of Social Security’s anti-fraud office who has “posted positive remarks on social media about DOGE’s efforts to cut costs and search for fraud.”
Now, as far as DOGE’s efforts here, currently, it’s unclear exactly what information DOGE was trying to access — or if they have been successful.
But Nancy Altman, the president of the group Social Security Works, explained that the agency has a whole trove of very personal data, saying:
“S.S.A. has comprehensive medical records of people who have applied for disability benefits. It has our bank information, our earnings records, the names and ages of our children, and much more.”[]
And going on to warn about the serious risks of DOGE accessing this information, adding “There is no way to overstate how serious a breach this is.”
But that’s where I’m going to end this one, and for now, we’ll continue keeping a close eye on DOGE’s efforts to access sensitive data.
As well as what exactly Musk’s role in all this is.
-
It’s been a rough few days for Ukraine.
It was pummeled by Russian attacks, dealing with a crazy US offer for its minerals, being left out of peace talks, and a lot, lot more.
Let’s start with late last week, when it was revealed that President Volodymyr Zelensky had a tense closed door meeting with American officials.
During this meeting, the US tried to get a deal for 50% of Ukraine’s mineral wealth and in return…. Well… reportedly Ukraine wasn’t getting a lot.
(The deal might actually be for even more, with one Ukrainian official being quoted as saying that the US actually wanted 50% of Ukraine’s natural resources -- so that includes oil and gas).[]
European officials indicated that it seemed like this deal was largely for the support the US has already given Ukraine.
So a reimbursement, essentially.
And that characterization is at least partially true, based on statement by US National Security Adviser Mike Waltz who said on Sunday:
“The American people deserve to be recouped, deserve to have some kind of payback for the billions they have invested in this war.”
“I think that Zelensky would be very wise to enter into this agreement with the United States.”
Ukrainian officials said that one benefit would be that some profits made from the venture would be reinvested into post-war reconstruction.[]
That wasn’t enough though and Zelesnky himself said he turned down the deal because there weren’t any security guarantees tied to the resources.
Getting that guarantee is SUPER important to Ukraine because they largely feel like they were already burned by the West once.
Right, after the Cold War, Ukraine had one of the largest stockpiles of nuclear weapons.[]
They agreed to give them back to Russia and in return the US, UK, and Russia all agreed to maintain and protect Ukraine’s sovereignty…. And that clearly hasn’t happened.
But on that note things might be shifting.
When speaking to the Wall Street Journal last Thursday, Vice President JD Vance said that the US had “military tools of leverage” it could use to pressure Russia.
So the outlet followed up by asking if sending troops was a possibility, leading Vance to say that “everything is on the table.”[]
He then backtracked on X the next day, writing:
“President Trump is the ultimate deal maker and will bring peace to the region by ending the war in Ukraine. As we've always said, American troops should never be put into harm's way where it doesn’t advance American interests and security. This war is between Russia and Ukraine.” []
He also blasted the Wall Street Journal, claiming that they twisted his words to make it seem like he said that troops in Ukraine were an option. []
(They have the full transcript and he never says that troops weren’t a possibility even when directly asked. So not sure how they “twisted” his words).
But the US isn’t the only one who could provide troops.
The idea has prompted European countries to suggest they’d be willing to send troops to Ukraine with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer saying on Sunday that he was:
“ready and willing to contribute to security guarantees to Ukraine by putting our own troops on the ground if necessary.”
He went on to add that “...securing a lasting peace in Ukraine that safeguards its sovereignty for the long term is essential if we are to deter Putin from further aggression in the future.”
Sweden was also on board with sending troops to Ukraine.
Many feel that Western troops of some kind are needed for peace to happen, as otherwise it would just be a way for Russia to prepare for another attempt.
At the time, Russia didn’t just outright reject this idea -- which is their normal reaction to any suggestion that involves NATO troops in Ukraine -- with the Kremlin’s spokesperson saying yesterday:
“It would mean that NATO forces would be deployed on Ukrainian territory.”
“This means that this is a very complicated question, and for now, no substantive discussions have been held about this matter.”
However as of this morning that changed and Russia said it would not accept any NATO troops in Ukraine. []
One of the reasons Karmer even suggested British troops be sent to Ukraine is because there’s a real fear in Europe that the US is going to ditch them.
Right, during a big conference in Munich this weekend the US made it clear that Europe’s security was their problem, leading to a frenzy by European countries to make plans.
As part of that, they are also working on a huge military aid package for Ukraine.
(Right, because the aid packages aren't just money directly sent to Ukraine. Instead it’s in the form of boosting domestic production and sending that stuff to the war.
But in the long term this increases how many weapons European companies can make)
Another reason for Europe’s sudden shift is because of how quickly the Trump administration is moving towards Russia.
Right, just last week the president had a long phone call with Putin…
And then yesterday American and Russian officials were in Saudi Arabia to discuss a Ukrainian peace deal and other plans.
Those talks actually wrapped up this morning and seemed to be more of a “first step.”
But it’s almost a complete 180 from the past.
The US and Russia are going to set up teams to try and end the war as well as normalize relations between the US and Russia.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio added that the talks were also a chance to explore “...the incredible opportunities that exist to partner with the Russians.”
This will apparently open economic opportunities with Russia and Russian commentators hoped this would then turn into sanctions being lifted.
News that this was happening forced Zelensky to say yesterday that “We cannot recognize any agreements made about us without us.”
“But ultimately, the Russian side will be indispensable to this effort.”
(Although Rubio said Europe would be involved, other officials said that was unlikely… possibly setting up a wedge between the US and Europe).
All of this news of peace talks might make you think Russia has let up the gas a little bit within Ukraine, but that is definitely not the case.
It managed to shoot down about 103 and 67 were stopped by other measures,
However, high rise buildings were still hit, debris caused fires, and there are reported injuries (luckily there doesn’t seem to be any injuries though).[]
On the ground things continue to be rough for Ukraine, which has fought to try and stop Russian advances in the east.
Although with spring approaching it’s likely those advances will stop, as everything turns to mud.
There’s a lot of moving parts right now so we’ll keep an eye on this.
But we’ll probably see some big shifts in the coming months.
Use code defranco at Incogni to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan.
